Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShasteen, Jonathon R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSasson, Noah J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPinkham, Amy E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-17T19:48:51Z
dc.date.available2014-09-17T19:48:51Z
dc.date.created2014-04-03
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10735.1/4026
dc.description.abstractAmong a crowd of distractor faces, threatening or angry target faces are identified more quickly and accurately than are nonthreatening or happy target faces, a finding known as the "face in the crowd effect." Two perceptual explanations of the effect have been proposed: (1) the "target orienting" hypothesis (i.e., threatening targets orient attention more quickly than do nonthreatening targets and (2) the "distractor processing" hypothesis (i.e., nonthreatening distractors paired with a threatening target are processed more efficiently than vice versa, leading to quicker detection of threatening targets). Using a task, with real faces and multiple identities, the current study replicated the face in the crowd effect and then, via eye tracking, found greater support for the target orienting hypothesis. Across both the classical search asymmetry paradigm (i.e., one happy target in a crowd of angry distractors vs. one angry target in a crowd of happy distractors) and the constant distractor paradigm (i.e., one happy target in a crowd of neutral distractors vs. one angry target in a crowd of neutral distractors), fewer distractors were fixated before first fixating angry targets relative to happy targets, with no difference in the processing efficiency of distractors. These results suggest that the face in the crowd effect on this task is supported to a greater degree by attentional patterns associated with properties of target rather those of the crowd.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093914en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY 4.0 (Attributionen_US
dc.rights©2014 The Authorsen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectAngry facesen_US
dc.subjectTracking and trailingen_US
dc.subjectEyeen_US
dc.subjectFacial expressionen_US
dc.titleEye Tracking the Face in the Crowd Task: Why Are Angry Faces Found more Quickly?en_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.type.genrearticleen_US
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationShasteen, Jonathon R., Noah J. Sasson, and Amy E. Pinkham. 2014. "Eye tracking the face in the crowd task: why are angry faces found more quickly?." PLOS One 9(4): e93914-1 to 8.en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS Oneen_US
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC-BY 4.0 (Attribution
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC-BY 4.0 (Attribution