The Search for Clarity: An Impact Assessment of Permanent Supportive Housing in Dallas, Texas, and Comparative Case Studies of Housing First in Five Cities
Abstract
Abstract
Homelessness is one of the most visible social problems. Effective policies and programs
require an understanding of the complexity of homelessness, including its intersection with other
policy areas like health and criminal justice. In recent years, the federal government has
embraced the Housing First approach to address chronic homelessness. This resulted in
widespread adoption of Housing First, and subsequent programmatic variation, by homeless
service providers across the nation. This study consists of two parts: an impact assessment of
permanent supportive housing in Dallas, Texas, and comparative case studies of Housing First
programs in five cities. The impact assessment uses administrative data from four sources: the
Metro Dallas Homeless Alliance Beacon Health, Inc., the Texas Department of State Health
Services, and Dallas County. Results show housing placement and tenure are associated with
decreased acute healthcare and jail use by homeless individuals. The findings from this study
may be informative to local policymakers as they discuss potential solutions to the homeless
problem in Dallas. The comparative case studies explore the variation in the implementation of
Housing First programs in five select cities: Dallas, Austin, Houston, Salt Lake City, and Los
Angeles. Data collection entailed interviews with homeless service providers, documentation
review, and site-visits. Findings highlight the dynamic environment in which Housing First
programs operate and the challenges faced in service delivery. Furthermore, the findings
underscore the importance of contextual factors, which affect how Housing First is implemented.