Recommendations for the Use of Common Outcome Measures in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Simple item page
dc.contributor.ISNI0000 0003 5170 3614 (Chapman, SB)
dc.contributor.LCNA2012043141‏ (Chapman, SB)
dc.contributor.authorMcCauley, Stephen R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWilde, Elisabeth A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Vicki A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBedell, Garyen_US
dc.contributor.authorBeers, Sue R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Thomas F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Sandra Bonden_US
dc.contributor.sponsorCallier Center for Communication Disordersen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorCenter for BrainHealthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-10T23:08:15Z
dc.date.available2014-02-10T23:08:15Z
dc.date.created2012-03-01
dc.description.abstractThis article addresses the need for age-relevant outcome measures for traumatic brain injury (TBI) research and summarizes the recommendations by the inter-agency Pediatric TBI Outcomes Workgroup. The Pediatric Workgroup's recommendations address primary clinical research objectives including characterizing course of recovery from TBI, prediction of later outcome, measurement of treatment effects, and comparison of outcomes across studies. Consistent with other Common Data Elements (CDE) Workgroups, the Pediatric TBI Outcomes Workgroup adopted the standard three-tier system in its selection of measures. In the first tier, core measures included valid, robust, and widely applicable outcome measures with proven utility in pediatric TBI from each identified domain including academics, adaptive and daily living skills, family and environment, global outcome, health-related quality of life, infant and toddler measures, language and communication, neuropsychological impairment, physical functioning, psychiatric and psychological functioning, recovery of consciousness, social role participation and social competence, social cognition, and TBI-related symptoms. In the second tier, supplemental measures were recommended for consideration in TBI research focusing on specific topics or populations. In the third tier, emerging measures included important instruments currently under development, in the process of validation, or nearing the point of published findings that have significant potential to be superior to measures in the core and supplemental lists and may eventually replace them as evidence for their utility emerges.en_US
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMcCauley, Stephen R., Elisabeth A. Wilde, Vicki A. Anderson, Gary Bedell, et al. 2012. "Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in pediatric traumatic brain injury research." Journal of Neurotrauma 29(4): 678-705.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0897-7151en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage678en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10735.1/3039
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.1838en_US
dc.rights©2012 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Neurotraumaen_US
dc.subjectBrain Injuriesen_US
dc.subjectInfanten_US
dc.subjectDisabled Childrenen_US
dc.titleRecommendations for the Use of Common Outcome Measures in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Researchen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.type.genrearticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BBS-FR-Chapman-310576.49.pdf
Size:
290.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Mary Ann Liebert POLICY.pdf
Size:
93.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

Chapman, Sandra Bond
Campbell, Thomas F.
CBH Research