Chung, Chris ChangwhaLee, Seung-HyunLee, Jeoung-Yul2013-01-082013-01-082012-08-192013-01-08http://hdl.handle.net/10735.1/2477This study examines the dual implications of dual-option subsidiaries on exit decisions during times of economic crisis. Retaining dual-option subsidiaries in crisis-stricken countries means leaving a shadow option open for future growth once a crisis ends. However, MNCs may encounter problems pursuing either option due to challenges in managing dual-option subsidiaries with clashing strategic mandates. The equivocal nature of dual-option subsidiaries points to the possibility of another factor playing an important moderating role in exit decisions—subsidiary performance—which has been rarely considered in the MNC real options literature. Our primary argument is that lower subsidiary performance increases the influence of shadow option value embedded in dual-option subsidiaries. Analyzing a sample of Korean MNCs’ subsidiaries in Asian economies, we find that when profitability falls, subsidiaries with dual options are less likely to be exited than those with single options.© Springer-VerlagInternational business enterprisesMultinational corporationsSubsidiary corporations.Dual-option subsidiaryTextChung, Chris Changwha, Seung-Hyun Lee, and Jeoung-Yul Lee. 2013. "Dual-option subsidiaries and exit decisions in economic crisis. Management International Review 53 (4): 555-577.